Eminent-domain concerns are a focal point as north Iowans consider the idea of allowing underground pipelines to transfer carbon dioxide for storage through their area properties.
Summit Carbon Solutions recently filed its initial permit request with state regulators. If approved, the pipeline would run through Hancock, Cerro Gordo, and Worth Counties along with several states to gather carbon from ethanol plants, eventually storing it underground in North Dakota.
As part of the process, Summit is trying to secure voluntary land easements from property owners.
Wally Taylor, an attorney representing the Sierra Club of Iowa, said the company’s filing did not include information about easements.
In its filing, Summit said it is uncertain to what extent it will have to use eminent domain, the process of seizing land, to move forward on the project.
Taylor noted he and landowners have filed motions to force Summit to release details regarding private property. Summit argues it is heavily focused on landowner engagement as part of its efforts.
But it has not quelled backlash from property owners, including the formation of a coalition to fight such projects.
Taylor pointed out a bill recently proposed in the Legislature to limit the scope of eminent domain for a private venture like this was abruptly pulled from consideration, despite the bill’s sponsor noting strong demand for the proposal.
Property owners argued the lack of a proper debate hinders their ability to protect the health of their land, including farms.
Taylor emphasized despite what companies such as Summit are promising about reducing their carbon footprint, his group is not convinced underground storage is a solution to climate change. There are at least two other carbon pipeline projects in the works in Iowa.
